A British Columbia Supreme Court judge gave the jury instructions to start deliberating Monday in the sexual assault trial of a former Vancouver Canuck.
Justice Catherine Wedge told jurors they must deliver a unanimous verdict after an honest, impartial and dispassionate review of the evidence, and they may only find Jake Virtanen guilty if the Crown has proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Wedge told jury members they must otherwise acquit Virtanen, even if they believe it鈥檚 likely he鈥檚 guilty of allegedly assaulting a woman in his Vancouver hotel room nearly five years ago, because that would constitute a failure of the Crown.
It鈥檚 up to the jury to assess the credibility of the 23-year-old woman鈥檚 testimony that she did not consent to having sex with Virtanen, who is now 25, the judge said.
鈥淲hat you must decide is whether the Crown鈥檚 evidence, considered in its totality, gives rise to only one inference of fact on the issue of consent, which is that the complainant did not consent to the sexual activity,鈥 Wedge said.
Virtanen was charged with one count of sexual assault in January following an investigation by Vancouver police.
He told the court last week that the woman had been an 鈥渆nthusiastic participant鈥 as they mutually began kissing and touching each other while lying in bed. They helped each other take their clothes off before having sex, Virtanen testified.
The Crown and defence counsel finished their closing arguments Monday by focusing on the reliability of two witnesses and their conflicting testimony.
Defence lawyer Brock Martland told the jury the woman鈥檚 testimony was 鈥渞iddled鈥 with inconsistencies, some minor and some 鈥渇undamental,鈥 arguing she was not a trustworthy witness and saying that wasn鈥檛 the case with Virtanen.
He said the evidence shows it鈥檚 true the woman didn鈥檛 verbally consent to having sex with Virtanen by saying 鈥測es,鈥 but she consented through her actions as Virtanen testified she was an active partner who never said 鈥渘o鈥 or seemed upset at any point.
The woman was 鈥渃rystal clear鈥 at the start of her testimony that she didn鈥檛 consent to any sexual activity with Virtanen, Martland said, but during cross-examination she accepted an earlier statement she had given to police indicating she was initially OK with kissing him and later objected to continuing or going further.
Crown counsel Alan Ip told the jury the woman had a 鈥渇irm鈥 memory of the critical details surrounding the alleged assault, and argued that failing to remember or making errors in 鈥渕inor, peripheral鈥 details does not detract from the strength of her evidence that she repeatedly told Virtanen that she did not want to have sex.
She was 鈥渦nshaken on major and important points of her testimony,鈥 he said, while arguing Virtanen 鈥渃oncocted and reconstructed鈥 much of his evidence.
Ip asked the jury to dispense with any potential preconceived notions about how someone should or shouldn鈥檛 act during or after a sexual assault.
The woman, whose identity is protected by a publication ban, testified that Virtanen pinned her down on the bed in his hotel room in September 2017.
Martland suggested she had persuaded herself and come to believe over time that she didn鈥檛 consent to having sex with Virtanen, and the civil lawsuit she filed shortly after publicly accusing him shows she was seeking a payout from an NHL player.
Ip told the jury they should view the civil lawsuit as evidence of the woman鈥檚 determination in wanting the alleged assault to come to light.
The court has heard he and the woman met at the Calgary Stampede in 2017, exchanged numbers and kept in touch throughout that summer.
They made plans to meet when she was visiting Vancouver that September and Virtanen picked her up from a friend鈥檚 house and drove back to his hotel.
The woman testified last week that she had a 鈥渟inking feeling鈥 in her stomach when they arrived, but she trusted Virtanen, so she went up to his room.
Virtanen disputed her testimony that she tried to push him off of her, telling the court she did not seem upset at any point after they arrived at the hotel.
The woman did not go to police at the time.
In April 2021, she posted her story to an Instagram page for survivors of sexual assault, then spoke with a reporter from Glacier Media for a newspaper story, naming Virtanen as the man who allegedly sexually assaulted her.
The Canucks placed Virtanen on leave in May 2021 after the assault allegation was made public, and then bought out his contract the following month.
He last played in the Russian-based Kontinental Hockey League.
The Canadian Press