An apartment building development proposed near the Parkinson Recreation Centre sparked debate at a public hearing Jan. 17.
The issue for several area residents is they feel the building is too tall for their neighbourhood.
鈥淲e are a three-storey building, this is going to be a six-storey building, we are going to be kissing balconies,鈥� said one resident.
Another neighbour added, 鈥渋t鈥檚 just not the right size for the area we are in.鈥�
The development, by Westpoint Projects, proposes 150 rental units, with one storey of at-grade parking and five storeys of apartments at 1575 Bernard Avenue, near Burtch Road.
READ MORE: Rental-only building planned for 麻豆精选鈥檚 Bernard Avenue
Coun. Gord Lovegrove noted that the city received 100 per cent opposition to the project in written comments.
鈥淚s there anybody in favour of this thing?鈥�
While zoning can allow up to six storeys, as the project is along a transit route, Coun. Ron Cannan said that it shouldn鈥檛 be a foregone conclusion.
鈥淚 believe in more responsible development and not development at all cost,鈥� he added.
Cannan and Lovegrove said while they believed it was a good development, they shared residents鈥� concerns that the building is too tall and wanted the developer to reconsider its project.
Coun. Loyal Wooldridge pointed out that 麻豆精选 currently has a 0.6 per cent vacancy rate.
鈥淲eek after week we get emails from people that are living in their cars, that can鈥檛 find a place to live and can鈥檛 work in our stores,鈥� he said.
Wooldridge added that council has heard loud and clear that high-rises, sprawl development and carriage houses are not wanted.
鈥淚 would urge my colleagues that this is the exact development we need in 麻豆精选 to meet the needs, especially of our young people.鈥�
Coun. Luke Stack said one of the challenges previous councils have wrestled with is how to grow the city, and accommodate new people coming to the community.
鈥淚f we don鈥檛 do that then essentially what I guess we鈥檙e finally concluding is that 麻豆精选 is not going to grow,鈥� he added.
Many residents said they liked the development, but voiced other concerns about parking, traffic, density and lost views. Several councillors noted that even a two or three-storey building would block some views of nearby buildings.
Council voted 6-2 in favour, with Cannan and Lovegrove opposed, of moving the project forward.
READ MORE: 10-year tax break for rental-only developments in 麻豆精选
@GaryBarnes109
gary.barnes@kelownacapnews.com
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter and subscribe to our daily and subscribe to our daily newsletter.
